<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Robots w/Lasers &#187; FPGA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.davr.org/category/hardware/fpga/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.davr.org</link>
	<description>Nintendo DS &#038; GBA development, microcontrollers, and occasionally FPGAs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:22:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of PC-based logic analyzers</title>
		<link>http://blog.davr.org/2010/03/16/comparison-of-logic-analyzers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.davr.org/2010/03/16/comparison-of-logic-analyzers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FPGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davr.org/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a comparison chart I&#8217;ve been working on that compares various PC-based logic analyzers. I made this mostly for myself because I&#8217;ve been wanting to buy a logic analyzer, but most of them are very expensive for a hobbyist&#8217;s budget. PC-based ones are a good compromise&#8230;they can be cheaper than standalone units since they don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a comparison chart I&#8217;ve been working on that compares various PC-based logic analyzers. I made this mostly for myself because I&#8217;ve been wanting to buy a logic analyzer, but most of them are very expensive for a hobbyist&#8217;s budget. PC-based ones are a good compromise&#8230;they can be cheaper than standalone units since they don&#8217;t need all the processing and display hardware. I&#8217;m currently leaning towards the $120 Zeroplus unit, it seems to provide the best bang/buck. There is the $50 open source one, but I think I&#8217;d wait a bit for more reviews of it, to see how good it really works.</p>
<p><a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=rmNr4Eeren8jBG7MXfHYxsQ">View Chart Full-Screen</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll write a review when I do decide on one. Also I know someone designing his own Logic Analyzer, if/when he finishes, I&#8217;ll give a link to that too.</p>
<p><span id="more-110"></span><br />
<iframe width="100%" height="350" src="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=rmNr4Eeren8jBG7MXfHYxsQ&#038;output=html"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.davr.org/2010/03/16/comparison-of-logic-analyzers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison of Entry-Level (aka cheap) FPGA boards</title>
		<link>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FPGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davr.org/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago I decided I wanted to play around with a FPGA &#8211; Field-Programmable Gate Array, basically it lets you design new hardware ICs (Integrated Circuits), without needing a multi-billion dollar chip fabrication plant. So I set out to research the available pre-made development kits I could play around with. They&#8217;re quite a bit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago I decided I wanted to play around with a FPGA &#8211; Field-Programmable Gate Array, basically it lets you design new hardware ICs (Integrated Circuits), without needing a multi-billion dollar chip fabrication plant. So I set out to research the available pre-made development kits I could play around with. They&#8217;re quite a bit more expensive to get into than microcontrollers (where you can buy a $3 chip and build a programming cable out of some old scraps of wire), so I looked for the least expensive boards that still had a decent set of features.</p>
<p>I ended up making a comparison chart of FPGA development kits, like I said this was over a year ago, so it may be a bit out of date, but the low-end of FPGA&#8217;s doesn&#8217;t move all that fast. Most of the information is still valid, but you might be best to do some research yourself before you take the plunge. I only considered boards that featured FPGAs from Xilinx and Altera, since I found other vendors are not competitive in the low-cost arena (low-cost was the most important feature to me at the time, I didn&#8217;t want to spend $5000 just to play around. And yes, there are $5000 development boards).</p>
<p><a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pjIW423lv_CeAOUTZcmTtXA">View Chart Full-Screen</a></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re curious, I ended up getting the DE2 (with the educational discount). It costs a bit more, but it has significantly more features, such that I&#8217;ll probably never run out of stuff to play with.</p>
<p>The ones highlighted in green are the ones I feel provide the best value, and just coincidentally fall at the $50, $100, and $150 price points.<br />
<span id="more-92"></span><br />
<iframe width="100%" height="350" src="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pjIW423lv_CeAOUTZcmTtXA"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
