<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparison of Entry-Level (aka cheap) FPGA boards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/</link>
	<description>Nintendo DS &#038; GBA development, microcontrollers, and occasionally FPGAs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 05:40:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hsu</title>
		<link>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-61407</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davr.org/?p=92#comment-61407</guid>
		<description>The FPGA4Fun boards are good, and the documentation is superb. But they don&#039;t provide the source for everything. However, the website is loaded with great examples see fpga4fun.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FPGA4Fun boards are good, and the documentation is superb. But they don&#8217;t provide the source for everything. However, the website is loaded with great examples see fpga4fun.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oakkar7</title>
		<link>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-60472</link>
		<dc:creator>oakkar7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davr.org/?p=92#comment-60472</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

Cann you add this in your sheet. Not so bad for entry level.

http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=593

http://www.designspark.com/content/de0-nano-fpga-development-kit-review-terasic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>Cann you add this in your sheet. Not so bad for entry level.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=593" rel="nofollow">http://www.terasic.com.tw/cgi-bin/page/archive.pl?No=593</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.designspark.com/content/de0-nano-fpga-development-kit-review-terasic" rel="nofollow">http://www.designspark.com/content/de0-nano-fpga-development-kit-review-terasic</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davr</title>
		<link>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-56362</link>
		<dc:creator>davr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davr.org/?p=92#comment-56362</guid>
		<description>Well there&#039;s the $50 one on the cheap end. But FPGA&#039;s are really quite expensive compared to say microcontrollers (where you can get a pretty powerful chip for just a couple bucks). Just the chip alone on the $50 board would run you about $20, then you have to consider the cost of the PCB (generally they are all at least 4 layers, much more expensive than a 2 layer PCB), and all the other peripherals like USB controllers, external memory, etc etc. The chip alone on the $150 DE1 runs about $60-70, plus it&#039;s got a ton of other things on the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there&#8217;s the $50 one on the cheap end. But FPGA&#8217;s are really quite expensive compared to say microcontrollers (where you can get a pretty powerful chip for just a couple bucks). Just the chip alone on the $50 board would run you about $20, then you have to consider the cost of the PCB (generally they are all at least 4 layers, much more expensive than a 2 layer PCB), and all the other peripherals like USB controllers, external memory, etc etc. The chip alone on the $150 DE1 runs about $60-70, plus it&#8217;s got a ton of other things on the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Parekh</title>
		<link>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-56336</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Parekh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davr.org/?p=92#comment-56336</guid>
		<description>Nice roundup. I am surprised that the price is still that high for all of them even with a student discount. I would have thought that there would have been at least one almost giving it away to gain student engineer traction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice roundup. I am surprised that the price is still that high for all of them even with a student discount. I would have thought that there would have been at least one almost giving it away to gain student engineer traction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trusty AKA EMP</title>
		<link>http://blog.davr.org/2009/05/18/comparison-of-entry-level-aka-cheap-fpga-boards/comment-page-1/#comment-53399</link>
		<dc:creator>Trusty AKA EMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davr.org/?p=92#comment-53399</guid>
		<description>wow dude long ways away from SinCity :) makin robots..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow dude long ways away from SinCity <img src='http://blog.davr.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  makin robots..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

